<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Christian Doubt&#187; Codex Sinaiticus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/tag/codex-sinaiticus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com</link>
	<description>thoughts from someone dealing with doubt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The existing manuscripts are so close to the original autographs</title>
		<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/resources/reasons-for-believing-in-christianity/the-existing-manuscripts-are-so-close-to-the-original-autographs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-existing-manuscripts-are-so-close-to-the-original-autographs</link>
		<comments>http://www.christiandoubt.com/resources/reasons-for-believing-in-christianity/the-existing-manuscripts-are-so-close-to-the-original-autographs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lefers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[autograph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Codex Sinaiticus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extant manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gospels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manuscripts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christiandoubt.com/?page_id=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The oldest manuscript of the Gospels is a papyrus fragment of the Gospel of John, called P52, an dates around A.D. 125. The next oldest Gospel manuscripts come from 200-250 A.D. (P4, P45, P64, P66, P67, P75). The Codex Sinaiticus &#8230; <a href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/resources/reasons-for-believing-in-christianity/the-existing-manuscripts-are-so-close-to-the-original-autographs/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The oldest manuscript of the <a href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/tag/gospels-2/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with gospels">Gospels</a> is a papyrus fragment of the Gospel of John, called <a title="P52" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/papyrus-52/">P<sup>52</sup></a>, an dates around A.D. 125. The next oldest Gospel <a href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/tag/manuscripts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with manuscripts">manuscripts</a> come from 200-250 A.D. (P<sup>4</sup>, <a title="P45" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/papyrus-45/">P<sup>45</sup></a>, <a title="P64" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/papyrus-64/">P<sup>64</sup></a>, <a title="P66" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/papyrus-66/">P<sup>66</sup></a>, <a title="P67" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/papyrus-67/">P<sup>67</sup></a>, <a title="P75" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/papyrus-75/">P<sup>75</sup></a>). The <a title="Codex Sinaiticus" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/gospel-manuscripts/codex-sinaiticus/">Codex Sinaiticus</a> which contains the whole NT dates to the fourth century A.D. The gap between the oldest <a href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/tag/extant-manuscript/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with extant manuscript">extant manuscript</a> and the <a href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/tag/autograph/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with autograph">autograph</a> is magnitudes shorter than any other ancient writing.</p>
[post_in_post]
<h3>Source:</h3>
<p><a title="Mark D. Roberts, Can We Trust the Gospels?, 31" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/can-we-trust-the-gospels-by-mark-d-roberts/">Mark D. Roberts, Can We Trust the Gospels?, 31</a></p>
<h2>Response:</h2>
<p>No autographs exist today, and it is unlikely that one will ever be found. The earliest manuscripts are very small fragments (<a title="P52" href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/papyrus-52/">P<sup>52</sup></a> is business card size) and date 100 years or more after the events they describe. In addition dating early manuscripts by paleography isn&#8217;t precise and can present a range of 25 to over 125 years. So these manuscripts could be even later.</p>
<h2>References and Links:</h2>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christiandoubt.com/resources/reasons-for-believing-in-christianity/the-existing-manuscripts-are-so-close-to-the-original-autographs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Codex Sinaiticus</title>
		<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/07/20/codex-sinaiticus/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=codex-sinaiticus</link>
		<comments>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/07/20/codex-sinaiticus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lefers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gospels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Codex Sinaiticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone the other day pointed me to this great link that has the Codex Sinaiticus online. The Codex Sinaiticus is is one of the most important hand-written ancient copies of the Greek Bible. It It has been dated to the &#8230; <a href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/07/20/codex-sinaiticus/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-323" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Codex_Sinaiticus" src="http://christiandoubt.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Codex_Sinaiticus-300x176.jpg" alt="Codex_Sinaiticus" width="240" height="141" /></a>Someone the other day pointed me to this great link that has the <a href="http://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx">Codex Sinaiticus</a> online. The <a href="http://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx">Codex Sinaiticus</a> is is one of the most important hand-written ancient copies of the Greek Bible. It It has been dated to the 4th century (based on palaeographical analysis) and contains one of the very oldest and best <a href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/tag/manuscripts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with manuscripts">manuscripts</a> of the New Testament. The only earlier New Testament <a href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/tag/manuscripts/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with manuscripts">manuscripts</a> contain small portions of the text.</p>
<p>I easily burned through several hours just playing with the different features. It was a little clunky at times, but to click on different parts of the manuscript, then see the translation, and compare it to my NIV version was really cool. I wish they could do this for some of the other early manuscripts too. For those who don&#8217;t know the field well (like myself), it adds so much to actually see the manuscripts and to see the translations and to compare it to the Bible I have in hand today. It gives me a bit more confidence that what we have today is what the Gospel writers wrote back then. I just have to keep thinking and pondering whether what they wrote down is true or not (unfortunately the harder part).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/07/20/codex-sinaiticus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

