<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Kinds of Skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=two-kinds-of-skepticism</link>
	<description>thoughts from someone dealing with doubt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=341#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Mike,

That&#039;s not a word that leaps to mind when I think of Peabody. Why not actually read around in the book -- Mark has provided a hyperlink -- before jumping to conclusions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not a word that leaps to mind when I think of Peabody. Why not actually read around in the book &#8212; Mark has provided a hyperlink &#8212; before jumping to conclusions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike aka MonolithTMA</title>
		<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike aka MonolithTMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=341#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Tim. Maybe I&#039;ll pick it up at some point. I prefer not to read lengthy pieces on the computer, I&#039;d rather have a book in hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Tim. Maybe I&#8217;ll pick it up at some point. I prefer not to read lengthy pieces on the computer, I&#8217;d rather have a book in hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike aka MonolithTMA</title>
		<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike aka MonolithTMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=341#comment-370</guid>
		<description>I agree that skepticism for the sake of skepticism is bad. Peabody just came off as a little smug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that skepticism for the sake of skepticism is bad. Peabody just came off as a little smug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lefers</title>
		<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lefers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=341#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Mike,
I agree that both sides are guilty of a &quot;gut skepticism&quot;, a skepticism of anything one dosen&#039;t like, or want to be true. I think that was what Peabody was trying to get at. Granted he gives his opinion that a thorough analysis of the evidence will lead to Christianity, but I don&#039;t have a problem with someone giving their opinion. I think the value in this quote is the warning against the &quot;scepticism of the heart&quot; or what I would term &quot;gut skepticism&quot;. This is similar to the analogy of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://christiandoubt.com/2009/09/13/skeptical-dial/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;skeptical dial&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,<br />
I agree that both sides are guilty of a &#8220;gut skepticism&#8221;, a skepticism of anything one dosen&#8217;t like, or want to be true. I think that was what Peabody was trying to get at. Granted he gives his opinion that a thorough analysis of the evidence will lead to Christianity, but I don&#8217;t have a problem with someone giving their opinion. I think the value in this quote is the warning against the &#8220;scepticism of the heart&#8221; or what I would term &#8220;gut skepticism&#8221;. This is similar to the analogy of a <a href="http://christiandoubt.com/2009/09/13/skeptical-dial/" rel="nofollow">skeptical dial</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike aka MonolithTMA</title>
		<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike aka MonolithTMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=341#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Ahh, yes, the supreme arrogance of each brand of Christianity that considers it&#039;s self the One True Faith™. What kind of skepticism leads to other faiths? There are an equal amount of Christian sites that expound hate and bitterness. I&#039;ve had my olive branch cut off or set on fire more than once. I love that Peabody feels that the only right way of being skeptical is the way that leads to accepting his belief system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, yes, the supreme arrogance of each brand of Christianity that considers it&#8217;s self the One True Faith™. What kind of skepticism leads to other faiths? There are an equal amount of Christian sites that expound hate and bitterness. I&#8217;ve had my olive branch cut off or set on fire more than once. I love that Peabody feels that the only right way of being skeptical is the way that leads to accepting his belief system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.christiandoubt.com/2009/09/09/two-kinds-of-skepticism/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christiandoubt.com/?p=341#comment-367</guid>
		<description>And God bless you in it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And God bless you in it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

